Matt Walsh met en lumière « anti-porn »
Cette vidéo a été diffusée sur YouTube par Matt Walsh
dédié à « anti-porn »:
[embedded content]
À la date de notre découverte, cette vidéo captait l’attention. Le nombre de Likes indiquait: 687.
La durée de 00:48:13 secondes et le titre The Anti-Porn Argument No One Has Addressed « Aimez et abonnez-vous à de nouvelles vidéos tous les jours. Le débat sur le porno a été fascinant cette semaine, les conservateurs tombant de chaque côté de la discussion. Mais il y a un argument pour une interdiction ou une réglementation porno que je n’ai entendu personne de l’autre côté de l’adresse du débat. Je veux le disposer aujourd’hui. En outre, une vidéo déprimante montre que les étudiants qui soutiennent Medicare pour tous pour tous, même s’ils n’ont aucune idée de ce que cela implique. Et nous débats: Quelle est la pire chanson de Noël de tous les temps? Pour écouter cet épisode, abonnez-vous au Matt Walsh Show sur iTunes: https://apple.co/2egkuro (Tagstotranslate) Podcast ».
YouTube est une plateforme polyvalente qui permet à chacun de trouver des vidéos sur des sujets variés, offrant un espace d’expression personnelle tout en veillant à respecter les valeurs de diversité, de respect et de sécurité dans les interactions.
Décrypter les enjeux de la dépendance à la pornographie
Repérer les symptômes de dépendance
La consommation compulsive de pornographie, souvent associée à des sentiments de honte, perturbe les relations et les performances au travail.
Examiner comment le porno influence les activités quotidiennes
L’addiction peut impacter différents domaines de la vie, notamment la sexualité, la confiance en soi et les interactions intimes. Une consommation excessive de porno peut créer une dépendance émotionnelle où le plaisir sexuel devient exclusivement associé à ces contenus
Examiner les aspects psychiques en cause
Le processus addictif lié à la pornographie repose sur une suractivation des mécanismes cérébraux de récompense, accentuant les habitudes compulsives et le sentiment de mal-être.
Réinventer son image sans laisser place à la pornographie
Des relations solides favorisent un environnement positif
Créer des liens profonds favorise un plaisir sexuel plus vrai et épanouissant, sans dépendance à la pornographie
Adopter une approche éthique de la sexualité
Pratiquer une sexualité responsable et respectueuse renforce les liens affectifs et l’intimité Se défaire de la pornographie demande un travail de conscience, des outils spécifiques et un soutien constant. En suivant une approche structurée, il est possible de surmonter cette dépendance et de se reconnecter à une sexualité plus saine et respectueuse. Adopter des habitudes saines et prendre conscience des effets négatifs est un premier pas des supports sont mis à votre disposition par exemple la méthode de ce leader de la chasteté masculine controlée https://www.chastete.fr.
S’engager dans des activités bénéfiques et équilibrées au quotidien
Prendre du temps pour des pratiques comme le yoga ou la méditation renforce l’harmonie corps-esprit et permet de mieux gérer les désirs compulsifs
Explorer les différentes formes d’aide accessibles
Intégrer un groupe d’accompagnement et de soutien
Participer à un groupe de soutien permet aux personnes de partager leurs défis, d’apprendre des méthodes efficaces et de bénéficier de la solidarité d’autres individus en rétablissement.
Demander l’avis d’un expert en santé mentale
Consulter un spécialiste des dépendances comportementales, tel un psychologue formé à la TCC, aide à comprendre les causes profondes et offre un suivi personnalisé.
S’appuyer sur des outils numériques et des applications pour suivre les progrès
Certaines plateformes numériques facilitent le suivi des progrès, offrent des rappels motivants et encouragent l’établissement de bonnes habitudes pour éviter la consommation de contenus pornographiques.
Mettre en place un programme structuré pour atteindre l’objectif de sevrage
Mettre en place des solutions pour contrôler les tentations
Apprendre à identifier les éléments déclencheurs et à les éviter est un processus clé. Les solutions incluent la thérapie comportementale, des pratiques saines et un réseau de soutien.
Adopter des objectifs simples et réalisables
L’élaboration d’un plan de sevrage passe par des objectifs bien définis, comme la réduction progressive du temps de consommation de porno. Il est également nécessaire d’explorer les causes profondes de cette dépendance et les bénéfices d’une vie sans elle.
Instaurer un cadre propice à la relaxation
Les extensions de navigateur et les applications de contrôle parental peuvent être des outils précieux pour limiter l’accès aux contenus pornographiques. En complément, se tourner vers des activités qui stimulent la créativité et la productivité peut également aider à réduire les envies compulsives.
Ce lien vous permet de voir la vidéo sur YouTube :
le post original: Cliquer ici
#Largument #antiporno #personne #abordé
Retranscription des paroles de la vidéo: so you know I’m really fascinated by the debate that has been raging these past several days among conservatives around the issue of pornography and I’m happy to accept part of the blame for helping to start this this little scuffle because I think that it’s been a clarifying moment for conservatism I think it’s been very interesting conversation as well and there was an article in Vox written by Jane Koston who and she she called me up and talked to me before writing the article as well to get my thoughts on I thought she did it’s actually very objective and fair and insightful so I’d recommend that you go check it out but as she you know talking to both sides of the conservative divide on this as she as she outlines the dispute over porn regulation really Springs from a more fundamental disagreement about the purpose and the nature of government and so different conservatives have come down to different sides sides of this guys like Sarah boom ari have come down on the pro regulation side while the libertarians over reason have unsurprisingly come down on the other side and then also as I’m sure probably you’ve noticed if you if you watch all the shows and you follow everybody here at the Daily wire you’ve noticed that the dividing line on this issue runs right through the Daily wire as well so Michael Knowles and Josh hammer are also on on of the view that government has a legitimate role in battling the porn epidemic and then you’ve got ben shapiro and the god-king jeremy boring say that you know it should not have a substantial role and that any role if there is one should not be an outright ban so i don’t want to say that their position is that the government has no role at all i don’t think that is their position but certainly they don’t agree with an outright ban they don’t think it seems to me they don’t think there should be a substantial significant role by the government in regulating this stuff now i think every everybody who’s chimed in has contributed thoughtfully to the discussion and i’m not just saying that because two of them signed my page I think actually think that everyone’s been very thoughtful about it but through this whole back and forth and and this is why I wanted says we we started the week talking about this and it’s been a running thread throughout the week and now we’re at the end of the week so I figured let’s put a let’s put a capstone on the week at least for me on this issue and and putting a capstone on what I would really like to do is try to bring the conversation back to what I think is when it comes to pornography the central point now there is a broader more philosophical point that we’ve been talking about but I want to bring it back to what I think is the central point when it comes to pornography specifically and what I also think is Mott is it is my strongest argument so putting aside for a moment the philosophical discussion about the nature of government the state’s role in preserving the common good which is an important conversation also again I think a really interesting one but it leads us far into the weeds and I think we lose sight of the original subject that we’re supposed to be talking about and so that’s why I wanted to re-emphasize a very simple point that I’ve made about the porn problem I want to go back to it because everybody that’s chimed in on this I if they if they have I haven’t heard it but I have not heard anyone address this point that I’m about to make and that I’ve already made several times and that I think has been lost in the whole does government protect the common good or is about preserving Liberty are those the same things are they not all of that the defense of pornography or at least of its from of its remaining legal and mostly unregulated seems to hinge on the fact the alleged fact that the content in pornography is produced and viewed by consenting adults right if viewers do not consent to viewing a sexual act then we all probably agree that a crime has occurred so I think even on the far reaches of extreme libertarianism I don’t think you’re gonna find very many people who say that you have a right to have an orgy on the subway okay porn is different it’s argued because you only view it if you seek it out if viewers of porn were not consenting if internet porn let’s just say or of such a nature that millions of people were forced to watch it against their will every year then it would seem that the argument against prohibition or regulation starts to crumble so that the the argument the argument against my point and Michael Noel’s point josh hammers point no Mary’s point I think the argument really hinges on this this this concept of consent you take that out and I think the opposition argument really falls apart well I think that that’s that it has fallen fallen apart I think the argument has already crumbled because indeed millions of people are exposed to it every year against their will against their consent and I think those who are defending the legality of porn seem to be ignoring this group and this argument and that to me seems like an insurmountable moral and logical flaw in their position children okay that’s what I think this we got to bring this back to that for me is as I said the central point here children are first exposed to porn at the age of 11 on average so as we speak right now there are no doubt millions of minors some of them as young as five or six watching adults have sex on the internet this is an indisputable fact okay that’s how large the numbers are you have millions of kids watching this stuff I think anyone would deny that but does that fact not really destroy the consent excuse offered by the other side because our legal system rests on the assumption that minors can not consent to engage in sexual acts and not now that they don’t that they can’t by their nature if an adult has sex with a child the adult is guilty of rape no matter if the child verbally agreed to it or not in our society we understand that children lack the mental and emotional faculties to consent they cannot consent to deny that is to literally defend pedophilia well if children cannot consent to engage in a sexual act does it not inevitably follow that they cannot consent to witness such an act if they cannot consent as a second party participant does it not follow that they cannot consent as a third-party participant and in pornography the viewer is the third-party participant thus if my logic is correct here and I think it is I think I think I’m drawing I’m connecting the dots pretty pretty logically here so that means that every child who watches porn does so by definition without consent I don’t see how you can quibble with this argument without also quibbling with the logic for criminalizing pedophilic behavior now I’m not saying that the people on the opposite side of this issue are trying to legalize pedophilia I’m not saying that I’m saying that they fail to appreciate how our laws against pedophilia already provide a basis for pornography regulation that’s my point this all means that every consenting adult who posts hardcore sex videos to the Internet does so knowing that children can very easily access it and view it they are putting it as it were within reach of a child if the child reaches for it who do we blame is it the child’s fault or the fault of the person who put it there I would argue that every child who has viewed internet pornography is a victim of abuse and the abuser is the person who posted the content where a child with no trouble at all could find it now it’s it’s even more it’s even more serious than this because the internet porn industry makes hundreds of millions of dollars a year on children each hit to a site like pornhub is monetized and we know the numbers show that millions of children are looking at porn so millions of children minors kids that are 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 they are going to that site just focusing on porn up for a moment pornhub is monetizing those hits so pornhub this is inescapable pornhub is making millions of dollars off of showing porn to kids if you don’t think the government has an interest in protecting the common good broadly speaking will you admit that it at least has an interest in preventing people from making millions on providing pornography to 12 year olds I mean can you at least acknowledge that can you at least entertain the possibility that maybe the government could have some interest there and there is not there just there is nothing if pornhub you all you do is just go to pornhub and that’s it and you got to click little things as are you 18 that’s it that’s the whole okay that’s that’s that’s the whole that’s that’s all that’s all the protection that are put in place shouldn’t at least be a lot more than that in terms of protection and when you get into all the what about alcohol what about cigarettes what about this that yeah all of that stuff there’s much more regulation and protection and yes kids still can can get their hands on it but there is much more there are many more protections put in place for all of that now the obvious dodged here as I’ve as I’ve been trying to tackle all week is to lay the blame at the feet of the parents and it and I really and I get you know I know the argument you’ll say well it’s not the pornographers fault it’s up to the parents to stop their kids from seeing this stuff I just I I think that this rejoinder is very lazy and I also speculate that a good number of the people making this argument either aren’t parents or you know they had young kids a long time ago before the internet was really a problem I just I think that if you are a parent of a you know 11 12 13 year old kid you probably have a greater appreciation than a lot of people seem to have for how overly simplistic that argument is now it’s true that parents should be doing everything they can to shield their children from the filth on the internet but it’s also true that the Internet is ubiquitous and parents cannot on their own do a sufficient job in shielding their kids from it they just can’t it’s not that they won’t or that they they don’t feel like it it is they can’t that’s the reality that’s the reality of the society we live in if the child has no phone no internet access at home I mean you’re going as Extreme as you possibly can which isn’t even that extreme but these days I mean having no internet at home that’s that’s pretty extreme and in terms of protecting your kid from from Internet poor that’s that’s that’s what else can you do that’s that’s as far as you could possibly go but let’s say that you go as far as you could possibly go well he can still go almost anywhere and access the Internet dozens of different ways so short of moving into a cave in the desert which maybe isn’t such a bad idea but short of that a parent can only provide partial cover but partial cover in the end is only a little better than no cover at all besides none of this does anything to relieve the responsibility of the person posting the content in the first place even if every child exposed to porn has ineffectual and inattentive and lazy and bad parents which most emphatically is not the case but even if it was that still does not explain why anyone should have the right to post sex videos on a public forum where children can easily access them we can talk about parents parents that doesn’t well what about this let’s look at an adult okay forget about the parents for a second let’s think here about an adult who has a sex video a depraved graphic sex video and he is now making the choice to upload this to the internet send it out into the world for anyone to see what about him does he have no responsibility what is he some kind of animal he can’t control himself well you’re really gonna put all of the responsibility on the parents none on this creep at all none on this scumbag who’s putting this on the internet for it I mean just here you go anyone that wants to see it so your tell you no responsibility for that guy all on the parents I mean that that’s the feedback I’m getting is that we’re not no we’re not even focused on that guy at all is that he can do whatever he wants I find that to be so morally obtuse that position that IIIi it’s I can’t it I have trouble believing that anyone really thinks that you know we’d let’s talk about children that are that are physically abused that are molested you know it’s probably true that that some children who are molested some could have been saved from that trauma had their parents been more vigilant but that does nothing to excuse the man who did the molesting me think about the were the worst pedophile in American history was was a pediatrician in Delaware this was not as only a few years ago abused hundreds of young kids and kids as young as I mean we’re talking babies to toddlers okay how was he able to do that in the in the doctor’s office well parents would send their kids back there two or three year old kid back with this monster who they didn’t know was a monster but but still they would send their kids back with the doctor alone now most parents know you never leave your child alone with a doctor I mean you should be in the room if the doctors telling you leave the room then that’s it red flags all over the place okay unless unless this is a surgery and they’re putting the kid under for some kind of serious surgery obviously you got to leave the room but then but then even in that case it’s not gonna just be one person in the room with an unconscious child right but so so you know the the parents who allow their their kids to go back with this this scumbag this monster this animal they were tragically not as vigilant as they should have been but but here’s my point that the blame still is not on the parents okay who have to live with this for the rest of their lives as well the blame is not on the parents there are also victims the blame is on the the the scumbag monstrous despicable human garbage that did this he’s the guy who did it it’s his blame so what I’m saying is and I’m not drawing a direct moral comparison not saying that someone uploads a sex video to the Internet is exactly like the serial you know the the worst serial pedophile in history I’m not saying that I’m trying to make a point about responsibility and so when you make that choice to upload that content to the Internet knowing that anyone can see it you’re not an idiot you know that kids are all over the Internet and they will be able to view it and not only that but you’re gonna profit if your pornhub you’re gonna profit off of that viewership so I say all the responsibility really is on you all of it how could it not be so the question is this do we have a natural human right and I want you to focus don’t focus on the viewers here for a moment focus on the people who distribute this content to put the content on the Internet these are the pornographers so be a pornographer these days it doesn’t just mean you work for a you know a studio that does pornography films and you’re a director or something you’re a pornographer if you if you worked at pornhub you’re a pornographer because you’re distributing this content so let’s focus on the people distributing it do they have a natural human right to post hardcore sex videos online where children can see them is that a natural human right would you say is that is that something intrinsic to their human nature just you take that ability away and they’re not able to live a fulfilling human life anymore is that was it I mean is it something just utterly essential to – to your nature as a human to be able to do this would anyone argue that let me anyone who says yes has an extremely confused and hopelessly ambiguous conception of human rights but I think rational people will say no and but the people who say no must then way whether a person’s privileged to post this kind of content on the internet outweighs the right of a child to be free from sexual abuse and trauma so this does not have to be a debate about philosophies of governance and so on this can be much simpler you do not have a right to expose children to sexually explicit content you just you don’t have that right you don’t have a right to do it children do have a right to be to to certain basic legal protections I think that fact alone in my view settles the argument and I would be really interested in someone engaging with that specific argument that I just have laid out now by the way when I made this argument I my piece yesterday just to anticipate some of the objections I brought a piece yesterday making the same argument and a bunch of people countered that well you know if a child a child seeing porn if that’s automatically abuse I mean if a child is an abuse victim for seeing porn then what about a child who walks into the bedroom while his parents are having sex this now maybe you hear that that response and you think well that’s really stupid and it is but a lot of people that was their immediate response so I feel like I have to address it and this is what porn defenders always seem to do this seems to be the only trick in their bag is to draw these equivalencies obviously there’s a difference for one thing with what a what a child briefly witnesses when he walks into a bedroom at night before presumably his parents immediately usher him out what he witnesses will will not really be the same as what he will witness if he sits on pornhub for a few minutes okay also there’s the matter of intent a private act that is meant to be private and then is accidentally witnessed by someone is very different from an act that is broadcast on the Internet to a potential audience of millions obviously those are two different things and there’s a difference in kind also if a child walks in on his parents that’s awkward that’s embarrassing that’s not what you want but what he has witnessed what he has unfortunately witnessed is still the healthy and properly ordered expression of love and devotion between two married people you definitely would prefer for him not to witness it if you’re the parents but if he does the parents can explain they can have the awkward birds in the bees conversation and they can explain that when a man loves a woman they get together they get married etc and so forth what he will see in a porn film though is a woman being used integrated for the pleasure of anonymous by standards by standards that that again is very very very different another people think people have countered with is well what about other bad stuff kids might see online what about what about vulgar violent content hateful content graphic graphically violent content and as to that well as to that sort of stuff it kind of depends on what it is because there’s other yeah there is other kind there are other kinds of really disturbing SiC content online that should be illegal and oftentimes is and we’ll get to that in a second but this whole what about thing is so weak because it would be kind of like if I said it should be illegal for a parent to punch a child in the face okay which it is obviously but what if it wasn’t and then I were to argue that it should be and then you go and you say well wait a minute but what about a parent who smacks a child in the back of the head and then it’s like yeah well that that’s I mean that’s probably abuse too but it may be it depends a little bit on context is this a dad with his teenage son he’s kind of horsing around and you know it doesn’t just kind of joking around a little is it that or is this is this a toddler being smack in the back of the head and anger by a parent those are two very different things so it might depend and then and then you go well okay but what about what about someone who’s a child who’s spanked very hard with a belt and again it’s just what you’re doing is you keep coming with these what about sand what-ifs and hypotheticals and you’re dragging the conversation further and further and further into the gray area but remember where we started we started with something that is obviously bad and should obviously be illegal now if you keep going further and further down into the gray areas into the fine distinctions and all this stuff it’s gonna be harder and harder to draw those lines yes but we started with something that is very obvious I mean with that we all in fact would agree is bad and terrible and should be illegal apparent punching a child in the face and but what you’ve done is you’ve seemingly intentionally prevented us from addressing that issue by trying to make it seem like physical abuse itself is so ambiguous and so hard to legislate that there’s just no point in punishing or prohibiting prohibiting it in any form whatsoever you’ve tried to water down the discussion order in order to stop us from from talking about a very obvious and clear-cut form of abuse okay so any any of the what about you can draw here that does nothing to address what porn is and it is something that is damaging and traumatic and harmful to kids there’s no getting around that is there other stuff in that category maybe but can we talk about this category first and if there is other stuff that should also be addressed does that does that mean we can’t address this why are you so afraid to have this conversation and speaking of the other kinds of content that are illegal in fact someone brought this up yesterday I don’t remember if it was on Twitter or or I don’t remember where it maybe was in a comment section email huko it’s all it’s all blurred together but somebody said well what about you know there’s so many other horrible things what about crushing videos animal crushing videos now I don’t know if you’re familiar with animal crushing videos if you aren’t I’m sorry I have to tell you about them but they are a form of video and there’s a lot of them apparently online there’s though there’s a whole deranged sick community of people who post this stuff and it it’s exactly what it sounds like it’s videos of animals being crushed or otherwise tortured and killed and these videos are post online people watch them and because they get some kind of sick enjoyment out of it so someone brought that up to me said what about the crushing and to that I say yeah okay now here we go yes I would say that is definitely as harmful to watch if not more so I mean now it kind of depends away but but that is definitely at least in the same category but here’s the thing those videos are illegal in fact it just so happens that they were very recently made illegal on the federal level Donald Trump just signed something into law making it illegal to distribute and there were other things involved in this law too it wasn’t just targeted and animal crushing videos but that was included it is now illegal on the federal level as I understand the law to distribute post distribute whatever these animal crushing videos it’s illegal now that’s very interesting isn’t it because now it you could easily say well that’s totally different because you’re torturing and killing an animal and so something is being killed that’s different from pornography which again it’s it’s not always different from pornography because very often in many cases you have trafficked women and children who are in these videos and and you may not know it as the viewer so there is torture and torment going on in these videos as well but leaving that aside the point is it’s not it’s not it wasn’t made illegal to record the videos that was already illegal obviously obviously it’s illegal to torture an animal so I was already illegal the question is once that’s happened and there’s footage of it and the footage is out there I mean unfortunately the animals already dead so sharing the video is not gonna hurt the animal the animals already been killed technically that video itself doesn’t hurt anybody its footage of something being hurt but the video doesn’t hurt anybody what the law says now is that you even if you weren’t the one who did that you still cannot distribute this video so if someone were to send me a whole load of files of animal crushing videos I didn’t I didn’t hurt the animals the person who sent the videos didn’t hurt the animals the person that he got the videos from didn’t hurt the animals I mean down the line we could work 20 50 100 steps removed a million steps removed who knows but I have these videos now I cannot post them online and I shouldn’t be able to in my opinion but I wonder if you’re you know a defender of the legality of porn how do you deal with that because if you’re saying that pornography is and please I would ask you to deal with it aside from just scoffing look that’s totally different so stupid well it’s not totally different there there are some similarities here that I think you have to deal with one is the issue of speech I mean if pornography is speech then why isn’t this speech again not the act but what about why is it not speech for me to distribute these videos maybe there’s a message I’m trying to send that’ll be a message you like but I mean aren’t a my not expressing myself in some way with this video I mean if that’s if that’s not free speech if that doesn’t count as speech if you’re not gonna buy that that is expression then why would a you know a porn video a rape porn video even if everyone’s acting and it’s not really rape but but why is that expression so I think it touches on the on the speech issue it also touches on the issue of of the effect of viewing content what exactly is the problem with having videos of animal crutch crushing an animal torture all over the Internet what’s the problem what’s problem with having kids view it I mean again the the the being that was unfortunately hurt is already dead is not cannot continue to be hurt by it so that’s already done and over with so what’s the harm I mean do you think that a child is gonna watch a video like that and immediately go out and kill his dog maybe but probably not that directly but no we’re okay with those videos being illegal I assume you’re probably okay with it I certainly am we’re okay with it because number one it’s just depraved and horrible and ugly and wrong and just intrinsically evil number two the the the traumatic effect it would have on on the viewer especially children traumatized by it but also the influence it will have on them probably you know if a kids exposed to that video one time he’s probably not gonna go out and kill his dog but if he if he watches that stuff enough and starts to find it appealing for some reason yeah I think he is gonna be influenced obviously got clearly he’s gonna be influenced even if he never actually hurts an animal he’s going to be influenced in that direction what about all these videos online and some of the most popular search terms for pornography part of things like rape incest teenager and yeah these videos the legal ones anyway are it’s just pretend okay it’s not really incest they’re just they’re actors maybe that’s not really a fifteen-year-old it’s just it’s just someone who looks 15 but what is the effect okay you watch animal crushing videos enough you might be inclined to eventually go and and and mistreat an animal I think we all understand that you watch these kinds of videos enough isn’t that not going to sway you is that not going to influence you towards maybe being inclined to act out these things that you already obviously appealing and you have been feeding that dark part of your soul and your mind okay so switching gears here for a minute it’s switching gears a little bit actually because I think this sort of relates to the some of what we’ve been talking about this week but there’s this video that’s been going around online maybe you’ve seen it it’s from campus reform another other classic you know interviewing clueless students on the street bit those are always fun but this one there the students are asked if they support Medicare for all and then they all say yes of course and then there and then and then we find out if they still support it once they discover what’s actually in that bill what it actually entails so let’s uh let’s watch a little bit of this the policy right now they’re proposing it’s Medicare for all which is you know the idea of government-funded health care for everyone is that a concept you view favorably or unfavorably favorably for sure I do support Medicare for all I do I do think that every American deserves health care I do support that I think it’s an important form of universal health care I do support free health care for everybody in general I would say yes I do favor Medicare I don’t think there’s anything that you could really tell me that would make me of you unfavorably gonna give you a few of those things I want to see if you view them favorably or unfavorably within the plan and just see if it changes your opinion at all so first off it is mandatory so it would be over 100 million people right now have private insurance plans that they like they would be removed from those plans by the government would be mandatory and they would be put on the government plan even if they didn’t want to is that something that concerns you at all probably yeah do you do that element favorably or unfavorably I think I would say unfavorably for that unfavorably I mean they shouldn’t be like kicked off of it I guess that doesn’t seem fair I would say the government can’t force them to have health care with them and they’re just like that’s what this would do yeah I definitely think everyone should have health care but I think those who are able to get private health care don’t necessarily like shouldn’t have to necessarily be removed from it I mean as a Bernie support I think you do have to give up some choice just for the benefit of everyone in society so the second part it would eliminate private health insurance the entire industry it would be just under a million jobs would be eliminated because all insurance moved to the government okay very inspiring gives you a lot of hope for the future of our country doesn’t it so so how do how does this relate to our discussion this week well I think it relates this way because what you find is that these students initially support Medicare for all because they find the moral argument for it appealing and that’s and that’s how it’s sold to them you know and that’s how the left sells all of its policy ideas morally so you heard the first student say something like people deserve it or some of them something along those lines which is a moral statement talking about what people deserve then it all starts to fall apart not when they’re told about the financial cost although that does come later in the video when they discover that the Free Medicare isn’t actually free because the taxpayers have to pay for it turns out nothing is free in life I guess their dad’s never told them that they never gave them the old money doesn’t grow on trees stick but I think you see their dreams for Medicare for all start to die in their eyes start to fade a little bit when they’re presented with a fuller view of its moral implications people will be forced off of their private plans people will lose their jobs now there are economic issues there as well but mainly I think for these liberal students it’s the moral problem and so this is just a small example but it’s very important and I’ve been saying that’s not just this week but for years that the the left makes moral arguments for all of their positions all of it our policy ideas all the laws and legislation they support everything they always make those arguments on a moral basis just pay attention next time you hear a leftist whoever it is a Ossie Bernie Sanders what Elizabeth Warren I mean listen to the to the Democratic debates every argument they make is is moral in its character now when I say moral I don’t mean morally good I don’t agree with their arguments but they’re of a moral character they’re making the argument based on morality based on what they believe what they are claiming is just the right thing to do and that’s how they argue for everything it’s not about how much it’s gonna cost not about it it’s not really about economy it’s those are a peripheral those are secondary issues for them the way they present it is listen this is just the right thing to do and it’s effective it’s persuasive maybe not to you maybe not to me but to a lot of people it is especially people in my generation and younger they find it very persuasive because these are the arguments they care about these are the arguments everybody cares about when it comes down to it nobody really cares about any argument that isn’t moral I mean yeah you could talk about you could start getting into the financials and pull out the calculator and show how this is gonna be more nobody I mean this whole idea that people vote based on their pocket book I don’t know who came up with that originally but it is such nonsense people do not vote up vote on their pocketbook or their wallet they vote on morality that’s how people vote what drives you to the polls it’s because you you you think you’re standing for what’s right or because you’re afraid of someone else who’s gonna do the wrong thing take America down the wrong path the morally wrong path to a dark and evil future right that’s what gets you there it’s not about that it’s not it’s not about the money so what’s happened is the left they have hectored the right four years saying you can’t legislate morality you can’t legislate morality stop trying to legislate morality and then but they turn around and they make moral arguments for everything so they say don’t legislate morality and then they turn around and unabashedly try to slate morality but the rights you know you see we on the right wheat and and I’m sorry this is the case but we tend to be pretty gullible and clueless and it takes us a long time apparently to pick up on things and so we got suckered into this where the left forces don’t legislate morality and eventually conservatives said oh you’re right yeah no no we don’t to do that now we won’t argue about morals anymore no yeah let’s not argue about that then we went off over here and started arguing about financials and everything else while the left they cleared the field they’re sitting there saying you stupid suckers I can’t believe you fell for that and now they just continue now they make every argument on a moral basis and they can say that look you see those people over there they’re not even arguing for what’s right they don’t care they just care about their money those greedy Scrooge’s you see what they did they convinced us to vacate the moral premises and make arguments on economy or whatever else and while they continued to make those arguments so that we look like unfeeling sociopaths and automatons and nobody is persuaded nobody finds it compelling no one cares we’re not convincing anybody I mean worse is when you run into conservatives who are so I’m sorry stupid that they think especially you can’t make moral arguments to young people that’s what they think they think you think well you got to especially stay away from that with young kid no with young people you especially have to make the moral arguments they’re the most persuaded by those when you’re young you’re the most likely to be idealistic you care about you know fighting for what’s right and you’re willing to make sacrifices but you just you care more about that when you’re younger when you get older I think you become a little bit more practical and you start making compromises some of them good and some of them bad you stop caring as much about some of the you start being you stop being as convicted as you once were on moral issues I think now that’s not I don’t think that’s good I don’t think it should be that way but that is how it kind of works but again the left they they they suckered us they fooled us they said oh no young people don’t care that yeah talk to young people about tax policy they’re really gonna be they’re really gonna be convinced by that then they start go laughing at us did you hear them I just told him I just told him to talk to young people about tax policy and they believed it that’s it yes that’s what’s happening I mean we need to we need to wake up and realize [Music] every all laws entail legislating morality every law does but the left knows that the only people who don’t know it anymore are conservatives when it used to be that conservatives were the ones pointing us out it really is brilliant I mean you almost have to respect it it’s it’s so brilliant when you realize what the left has done it is really genius the way that over a few decades they have convinced conservatives to completely abandon their own principles and their own position Wow incredible also very depressing here’s something that’s not depressing this holiday season do your friends and family a solid by getting them a daily wire gift membership and the good news for you from now till January 1st all insider plus gift memberships will be twenty five percent off that means your loved one will get all the fantastic perks plus the majestic glorious beautiful profound leftist tears tumblr and you’ll get the savings that’s 25 percent off all the insider plus gift memberships this holiday season go to daily wire.com slash gift to get your twenty five percent off again that’s daily wire.com slash gift get your twenty five percent off just don’t tell your loved ones that you save twenty five percent on their gift in fact tell them that it was twenty five percent more that we charged just on principle but you’ll be giving them a gift that they’ll thank you for all year long let’s go to emails matt wall show at gmail.com this is from samantha says hi Matt big fan of the show yesterday you talked about the new baby it’s cold outside I agree that that song is horrid but also hilarious but it doesn’t hold a candle to Santa baby which is the worst Christmas song ever hands down Samantha I’m afraid you are incorrect the worst Christmas song ever hands down his wonderful Christmas time by Paul McCartney there is nothing that comes close to it this song is so bad that every think McCartney has done in his career or ever accomplished is erased by it none of that matters because he will forever and always be the guy who made the terrible redundant pointless empty awful song that plays over the intercom at the department store or every 12 minutes on the Christmas radio station you know your local Christmas music radio station I’ll tell you what makes a song so bad it’s stupid and lazy so other bad Christmas songs are just stupid Santa baby is stupid last Christmas is stupid but at least they’ve got their own kind of vibe to them their own sort of they they aren’t good but it sounds like maybe the people involved put a little bit of effort into it maybe wonderful Christmas time you could tell the McCartney wrote it in 95 seconds scrawled it on a used paper plate took another three minutes to come up with a melody and that was it so just I mean let’s listen listen to the lyrics I’m not gonna sing them but let’s just go think it helps sometimes to read them like spoken word poetry the moon is right the spirits up we’re here tonight and that’s enough simply having a wonderful christmas time simply having a wonderful christmas time okay what does that mean the moon is right and who evolved the moon for Christmas the imagery here is it’s not even relevant we’re here tonight and that’s enough has never been a more obvious throwaway line well there has been in this song because every line is a throwaway he’s just filling space he’s biding his time till he gets to the end of the song the party’s on the feelings here that only comes this time of year simply having a wonderful christmas time simply having a wonderful christmas time aside from wonderful christmas time has he even said anything that has anything to do with christmas and what is the feelings here mean the feeling just arrived to the party hey guys the feelings finally here what took you so long the choir of children’s sing their song they practice all year long ding dong ding dong ding dong ding dong simply having a wonderful christmas time simply having a wonderful christmas time i mean come on you you can tell exactly what happened here he had one line in mind for this verse that’s all he could come up with he could only think of one line the choir chil and sing their song could think of anything else thought about it though for 10 seconds and in fact it’s not even it’s not obvious to me that Paul McCartney even knows what Christmas is do they have Christmas in England is that the problem here I don’t think he knows what it is that’s what I’m getting from the lyrics he has no idea what this thing is someone called him up and says can he make a Christmas song and he said at Christmas what I got Chris a Christmas Chris Christmas and then he said I don’t know what that is but do people have a wonderful time on it yeah yeah they do okay I got it I got you I’ll call you back in five minutes so he puts down choir you know choir sings the song then he’s like yeah choir sings a song Carson so they practice all year long and now we need another you know needs another two he needs another two lines to fill out the verse and sorry so he thinks it’s practice all your law that’s in the song dingdong dingdong dingdong dingdong the word is out about the town to lift a glass and don’t look down don’t what well now he’s given up okay this at the end he’s given up it’s actually very depressing morbid song because at the end he’s given up on music he’s given off giving up on himself he’s given up on life it was this verse the word is out around the town what word the word that Christmas that’s Christmastime I think people are calling it hey guys you know crisp it’s Christmastime did you guys know that lift the glass and don’t look down well what do you mean don’t look down at the glass he needs but he needs a he needs a word that rhymes with town and so he says well town down Brown now down down yeah don’t look down don’t look down that’s it yeah we’ll go with that simply having a wonderful christmas time simply having a wonderful christmas time simply having a wonderful christmas time simply having a wonderful christmas time again take the chorus out and you have no clue this is a christmas song there is no Christmas imagery at all in this song honey I’m not even asking for religious content that’s not my point okay I know he’s not going to start talking about the christ-child but I mean no sleigh bells no eggnog no tree no mistletoe no Holly no nothing this is you know what this is like this is like if you’re gonna make a crappy pointless repetitive stupid country song but you never say anything in the song about blue jeans or pickup trucks or corn fields like if you’re gonna give us that kind of song then give us that song don’t give us a bad country song that doesn’t even have the stuff in it that makes it a country song so now we’d have to get we have a bad country song that isn’t even cut it’s just a bad song it’s just a blad generic song that isn’t even country so don’t give us a bad Christmas song that lacks even the Christmas parts of it because now we have a bad song that I don’t even know what to do with well apparently we play it all the time on Christmas I have no idea why so all the other bad Christmas songs you can name they’re bad they’re stupid they’re annoying but they are Christmas Santa baby I don’t know what’s going on in that song I get what this is like a love song to Santa pretty weird okay Santa is a what eighteen hundred year old fat morbidly obese man who breaks into he’s a serial burglar breaking into people’s homes and she’s so that’s strange but at least Santa so you got Santa at least at least there’s at least we’ve got Santa so there’s some Christmasy stuff going on all right I actually had more emails I was gonna do but that I spent 15 minutes on why I hate wonderful Christmas time so I think we’ll just have to wrap it up there and hope you guys all have a great weekend Godspeed the Matt Walsh show is produced by Sean Hampton executive producer Jeremy boring senior producer Jonathan hey supervising producer Mathis Glover supervising producer Robert Stirling technical producer Austin Stephens editor Donovan Fowler audio mixer Mike Cora Mina the Matt Walsh show is a daily wire production copyright daily wire 20 19 if you prefer facts over feelings aren’t offended by the brutal truth and you can still laugh at the insanity filling our national news cycle well tune in to the Ben Shapiro show we will get a whole lot of that and much more see you there .
Déroulement de la vidéo:
0.03 so you know I&;m really fascinated by the
0.03 debate that has been raging these past
0.03 several days among conservatives around
0.03 the issue of pornography and I&;m happy
0.03 to accept part of the blame for helping
0.03 to start this this little scuffle
0.03 because I think that it&;s been a
0.03 clarifying moment for conservatism I
0.03 think it&;s been very interesting
0.03 conversation as well and there was an
0.03 article in Vox written by Jane Koston
0.03 who and she she called me up and talked
0.03 to me before writing the article as well
0.03 to get my thoughts on I thought she did
0.03 it&;s actually very objective and fair
0.03 and insightful so I&;d recommend that you
0.03 go check it out
0.03 but as she you know talking to both
0.03 sides of the conservative divide on this
0.03 as she as she outlines the dispute over
0.03 porn regulation really Springs from a
0.03 more fundamental disagreement about the
0.03 purpose and the nature of government and
0.03 so different conservatives have come
0.03 down to different sides sides of this
0.03 guys like Sarah boom ari have come down
0.03 on the pro regulation side while the
0.03 libertarians over reason have
0.03 unsurprisingly come down on the other
0.03 side and then also as I&;m sure probably
0.03 you&;ve noticed if you if you watch all
0.03 the shows and you follow everybody here
0.03 at the Daily wire you&;ve noticed that
0.03 the dividing line on this issue runs
0.03 right through the Daily wire as well so
0.03 Michael Knowles and Josh hammer are also
0.03 on on of the view that government has a
0.03 legitimate role in battling the porn
0.03 epidemic and then you&;ve got ben shapiro
0.03 and the god-king jeremy boring say that
0.03 you know it should not have a
0.03 substantial role and that any role if
0.03 there is one should not be an outright
0.03 ban so i don&;t want to say that their
0.03 position is that the government has no
0.03 role at all i don&;t think that is their
0.03 position but certainly they don&;t agree
0.03 with an outright ban they don&;t think it
0.03 seems to me they don&;t think there
0.03 should be a substantial significant role
0.03 by the government in regulating this
0.03 stuff now i think every everybody who&;s
0.03 chimed in has contributed thoughtfully
0.03 to the discussion and i&;m not just
0.03 saying that because two of them signed
0.03 my page
0.03 I think actually think that everyone&;s
0.03 been very thoughtful about it but
0.03 through this whole back and forth and
0.03 and this is why I wanted says we we
0.03 started the week talking about this and
0.03 it&;s been a running thread throughout
0.03 the week and now we&;re at the end of the
0.03 week so I figured let&;s put a let&;s put
0.03 a capstone on the week at least for me
0.03 on this issue and and putting a capstone
0.03 on what I would really like to do is try
0.03 to bring the conversation back to what I
0.03 think is when it comes to pornography
0.03 the central point now there is a broader
0.03 more philosophical point that we&;ve been
0.03 talking about but I want to bring it
0.03 back to what I think is the central
0.03 point when it comes to pornography
0.03 specifically and what I also think is
0.03 Mott is it is my strongest argument so
0.03 putting aside for a moment the
0.03 philosophical discussion about the
0.03 nature of government the state&;s role in
0.03 preserving the common good which is an
0.03 important conversation also again I
0.03 think a really interesting one but it
0.03 leads us far into the weeds and I think
0.03 we lose sight of the original subject
0.03 that we&;re supposed to be talking about
0.03 and so that&;s why I wanted to
0.03 re-emphasize a very simple point that
0.03 I&;ve made about the porn problem I want
0.03 to go back to it because everybody
0.03 that&;s chimed in on this I if they if
0.03 they have I haven&;t heard it but I have
0.03 not heard anyone address this point that
0.03 I&;m about to make and that I&;ve already
0.03 made several times and that I think has
0.03 been lost in the whole does government
0.03 protect the common good or is about
0.03 preserving Liberty are those the same
0.03 things are they not all of that the
0.03 defense of pornography or at least of
0.03 its from of its remaining legal and
0.03 mostly unregulated seems to hinge on the
0.03 fact the alleged fact that the content
0.03 in pornography is produced and viewed by
0.03 consenting adults right if viewers do
0.03 not consent to viewing a sexual act then
0.03 we all probably agree that a crime has
0.03 occurred so I think even on the far
0.03 reaches of extreme libertarianism I
0.03 don&;t think you&;re gonna find very many
0.03 people who say that you have a right to
0.03 have an orgy on the subway okay
0.03 porn is different it&;s argued because
0.03 you only view it if you seek it out if
0.03 viewers of porn were not consenting if
0.03 internet porn let&;s just say or of such
0.03 a nature that millions of people were
0.03 forced to watch it against their will
0.03 every year then it would seem that the
0.03 argument against prohibition or
0.03 regulation starts to crumble so that the
0.03 the argument the argument against my
0.03 point
0.03 and Michael Noel&;s point josh hammers
0.03 point no Mary&;s point I think the
0.03 argument really hinges on this this this
0.03 concept of consent you take that out and
0.03 I think the opposition argument really
0.03 falls apart well I think that that&;s
0.03 that it has fallen fallen apart I think
0.03 the argument has already crumbled
0.03 because indeed millions of people are
0.03 exposed to it every year against their
0.03 will against their consent and I think
0.03 those who are defending the legality of
0.03 porn seem to be ignoring this group and
0.03 this argument and that to me seems like
0.03 an insurmountable moral and logical flaw
0.03 in their position children okay that&;s
0.03 what I think this we got to bring this
0.03 back to that for me is as I said the
0.03 central point here children are first
0.03 exposed to porn at the age of 11 on
0.03 average so as we speak right now there
0.03 are no doubt millions of minors some of
0.03 them as young as five or six watching
0.03 adults have sex on the internet this is
0.03 an indisputable fact okay that&;s how
0.03 large the numbers are you have millions
0.03 of kids watching this stuff I think
0.03 anyone would deny that but does that
0.03 fact not really destroy the consent
0.03 excuse offered by the other side because
0.03 our legal system rests on the assumption
0.03 that minors can not consent to engage in
0.03 sexual acts and not now that they don&;t
0.03 that they can&;t by their nature if an
0.03 adult has sex with a child the adult is
0.03 guilty of rape no matter if the child
0.03 verbally agreed to it or not in our
0.03 society we understand that
0.03 children lack the mental and emotional
0.03 faculties to consent they cannot consent
0.03 to deny that is to literally defend
0.03 pedophilia
0.03 well if children cannot consent to
0.03 engage in a sexual act does it not
0.03 inevitably follow that they cannot
0.03 consent to witness such an act if they
0.03 cannot consent as a second party
0.03 participant does it not follow that they
0.03 cannot consent as a third-party
0.03 participant and in pornography the
0.03 viewer is the third-party participant
0.03 thus if my logic is correct here and I
0.03 think it is I think I think I&;m drawing
0.03 I&;m connecting the dots pretty pretty
0.03 logically here so that means that every
0.03 child who watches porn does so by
0.03 definition without consent I don&;t see
0.03 how you can quibble with this argument
0.03 without also quibbling with the logic
0.03 for criminalizing pedophilic behavior
0.03 now I&;m not saying that the people on
0.03 the opposite side of this issue are
0.03 trying to legalize pedophilia I&;m not
0.03 saying that I&;m saying that they fail to
0.03 appreciate how our laws against
0.03 pedophilia already provide a basis for
0.03 pornography regulation that&;s my point
0.03 this all means that every consenting
0.03 adult who posts hardcore sex videos to
0.03 the Internet does so knowing that
0.03 children can very easily access it and
0.03 view it they are putting it as it were
0.03 within reach of a child if the child
0.03 reaches for it who do we blame is it the
0.03 child&;s fault or the fault of the person
0.03 who put it there I would argue that
0.03 every child who has viewed internet
0.03 pornography is a victim of abuse and the
0.03 abuser is the person who posted the
0.03 content where a child with no trouble at
0.03 all could find it now it&;s it&;s even
0.03 more it&;s even more serious than this
0.03 because the internet porn industry makes
0.03 hundreds of millions of dollars a year
0.03 on children each hit to a site like
0.03 pornhub is monetized and we know
0.03 the numbers show that millions of
0.03 children are looking at porn so millions
0.03 of children minors kids that are 8 9 10
0.03 11 12 13 14 they are going to that site
0.03 just focusing on porn up for a moment
0.03 pornhub is monetizing those hits so
0.03 pornhub this is inescapable
0.03 pornhub is making millions of dollars
0.03 off of showing porn to kids if you don&;t
0.03 think the government has an interest in
0.03 protecting the common good broadly
0.03 speaking will you admit that it at least
0.03 has an interest in preventing people
0.03 from making millions on providing
0.03 pornography to 12 year olds I mean can
0.03 you at least acknowledge that can you at
0.03 least entertain the possibility that
0.03 maybe the government could have some
0.03 interest there and there is not there
0.03 just there is nothing if pornhub you all
0.03 you do is just go to pornhub and that&;s
0.03 it and you got to click little things as
0.03 are you 18 that&;s it that&;s the whole
0.03 okay that&;s that&;s that&;s the whole
0.03 that&;s that&;s all that&;s all the
0.03 protection that are put in place
0.03 shouldn&;t at least be a lot more than
0.03 that in terms of protection and when you
0.03 get into all the what about alcohol what
0.03 about cigarettes what about this that
0.03 yeah all of that stuff there&;s much more
0.03 regulation and protection and yes kids
0.03 still can can get their hands on it but
0.03 there is much more there are many more
0.03 protections put in place for all of that
0.03 now the obvious dodged here as I&;ve as
0.03 I&;ve been trying to tackle all week is
0.03 to lay the blame at the feet of the
0.03 parents and it and I really and I get
0.03 you know I know the argument you&;ll say
0.03 well it&;s not the pornographers fault
0.03 it&;s up to the parents to stop their
0.03 kids from seeing this stuff I just I I
0.03 think that this rejoinder is very lazy
0.03 and I also speculate that a good number
0.03 of the people making this argument
0.03 either aren&;t parents or you know they
0.03 had young kids a long time ago before
0.03 the internet was really a problem I just
0.03 I think that if you are a parent of a
0.03 you know 11 12 13 year old kid
0.03 you probably have a greater appreciation
0.03 than a lot of people seem to have for
0.03 how overly simplistic that argument is
0.03 now it&;s true that parents should be
0.03 doing everything they can to shield
0.03 their children from the filth on the
0.03 internet but it&;s also true that the
0.03 Internet is ubiquitous and parents
0.03 cannot on their own do a sufficient job
0.03 in shielding their kids from it they
0.03 just can&;t it&;s not that they won&;t or
0.03 that they they don&;t feel like it it is
0.03 they can&;t that&;s the reality that&;s the
0.03 reality of the society we live in if the
0.03 child has no phone no internet access at
0.03 home I mean you&;re going as Extreme as
0.03 you possibly can which isn&;t even that
0.03 extreme but these days I mean having no
0.03 internet at home that&;s that&;s pretty
0.03 extreme and in terms of protecting your
0.03 kid from from Internet poor that&;s
0.03 that&;s that&;s what else can you do
0.03 that&;s that&;s as far as you could
0.03 possibly go but let&;s say that you go as
0.03 far as you could possibly go well he can
0.03 still go almost anywhere and access the
0.03 Internet dozens of different ways so
0.03 short of moving into a cave in the
0.03 desert which maybe isn&;t such a bad idea
0.03 but short of that a parent can only
0.03 provide partial cover but partial cover
0.03 in the end is only a little better than
0.03 no cover at all besides none of this
0.03 does anything to relieve the
0.03 responsibility of the person posting the
0.03 content in the first place even if every
0.03 child exposed to porn has ineffectual
0.03 and inattentive and lazy and bad parents
0.03 which most emphatically is not the case
0.03 but even if it was that still does not
0.03 explain why anyone should have the right
0.03 to post sex videos on a public forum
0.03 where children can easily access them we
0.03 can talk about parents parents that
0.03 doesn&;t well what about this let&;s look
0.03 at an adult okay forget about the
0.03 parents for a second let&;s think here
0.03 about an adult who has a sex video a
0.03 depraved graphic sex video and he is now
0.03 making the choice to upload this to the
0.03 internet send it out into the world for
0.03 anyone to see what about him
0.03 does he have no responsibility what is
0.03 he some kind of animal he can&;t control
0.03 himself well you&;re really gonna put all
0.03 of the responsibility on the parents
0.03 none on this creep at all none on this
0.03 scumbag who&;s putting this on the
0.03 internet for it I mean just
0.03 here you go anyone that wants to see it
0.03 so your tell you no responsibility for
0.03 that guy all on the parents I mean that
0.03 that&;s the feedback I&;m getting is that
0.03 we&;re not no we&;re not even focused on
0.03 that guy at all is that he can do
0.03 whatever he wants I find that to be so
0.03 morally obtuse that position that IIIi
0.03 it&;s I can&;t it I have trouble believing
0.03 that anyone really thinks that you know
0.03 we&;d let&;s talk about children that are
0.03 that are physically abused that are
0.03 molested you know it&;s probably true
0.03 that that some children who are molested
0.03 some could have been saved from that
0.03 trauma had their parents been more
0.03 vigilant but that does nothing to excuse
0.03 the man who did the molesting me think
0.03 about the were the worst pedophile in
0.03 American history was was a pediatrician
0.03 in Delaware this was not as only a few
0.03 years ago abused hundreds of young kids
0.03 and kids as young as I mean we&;re
0.03 talking babies to toddlers okay how was
0.03 he able to do that in the in the
0.03 doctor&;s office well parents would send
0.03 their kids back there two or three year
0.03 old kid back with this monster who they
0.03 didn&;t know was a monster but but still
0.03 they would send their kids back with the
0.03 doctor alone now most parents know you
0.03 never leave your child alone with a
0.03 doctor I mean you should be in the room
0.03 if the doctors telling you leave the
0.03 room then that&;s it red flags all over
0.03 the place okay unless unless this is a
0.03 surgery and they&;re putting the kid
0.03 under for some kind of serious surgery
0.03 obviously you got to leave the room but
0.03 then but then even in that case it&;s not
0.03 gonna just be one person in the room
0.03 with an unconscious child right but so
0.03 so you know the the parents who allow
0.03 their their kids to go back with this
0.03 this scumbag this monster this animal
0.03 they were tragically not as vigilant as
0.03 they should have been but but here&;s my
0.03 point that the blame still is not on the
0.03 parents okay
0.03 who have to live with this for the rest
0.03 of their lives as well the blame is not
0.03 on the parents there are also victims
0.03 the blame is on the the the scumbag
0.03 monstrous despicable human garbage that
0.03 did this he&;s the guy who did it
0.03 it&;s his blame so what I&;m saying is and
0.03 I&;m not drawing a direct moral
0.03 comparison not saying that someone
0.03 uploads a sex video to the Internet is
0.03 exactly like the serial you know the the
0.03 worst serial pedophile in history I&;m
0.03 not saying that I&;m trying to make a
0.03 point about responsibility and so when
0.03 you make that choice to upload that
0.03 content to the Internet knowing that
0.03 anyone can see it you&;re not an idiot
0.03 you know that kids are all over the
0.03 Internet and they will be able to view
0.03 it and not only that but you&;re gonna
0.03 profit if your pornhub you&;re gonna
0.03 profit off of that viewership so I say
0.03 all the responsibility really is on you
0.03 all of it
0.03 how could it not be so the question is
0.03 this do we have a natural human right
0.03 and I want you to focus don&;t focus on
0.03 the viewers here for a moment
0.03 focus on the people who distribute this
0.03 content to put the content on the
0.03 Internet these are the pornographers so
0.03 be a pornographer these days it doesn&;t
0.03 just mean you work for a you know a
0.03 studio that does pornography films and
0.03 you&;re a director or something you&;re a
0.03 pornographer if you if you worked at
0.03 pornhub you&;re a pornographer because
0.03 you&;re distributing this content so
0.03 let&;s focus on the people distributing
0.03 it do they have a natural human right to
0.03 post hardcore sex videos online where
0.03 children can see them is that a natural
0.03 human right would you say is that is
0.03 that something intrinsic to their human
0.03 nature just you take that ability away
0.03 and they&;re not able to live a
0.03 fulfilling human life anymore is that
0.03 was it I mean is it something just
0.03 utterly essential to – to your nature as
0.03 a human to be able to do this would
0.03 anyone argue that let me anyone who says
0.03 yes has an extremely confused and
0.03 hopelessly ambiguous conception of human
0.03 rights but I think rational people will
0.03 say no and but the people
0.03 who say no must then way whether a
0.03 person&;s privileged to post this kind of
0.03 content on the internet outweighs the
0.03 right of a child to be free from sexual
0.03 abuse and trauma so this does not have
0.03 to be a debate about philosophies of
0.03 governance and so on this can be much
0.03 simpler you do not have a right to
0.03 expose children to sexually explicit
0.03 content you just you don&;t have that
0.03 right you don&;t have a right to do it
0.03 children do have a right to be to to
0.03 certain basic legal protections I think
0.03 that fact alone in my view settles the
0.03 argument and I would be really
0.03 interested in someone engaging with that
0.03 specific argument that I just have laid
0.03 out now by the way when I made this
0.03 argument I my piece yesterday just to
0.03 anticipate some of the objections I
0.03 brought a piece yesterday making the
0.03 same argument and a bunch of people
0.03 countered that well you know if a child
0.03 a child seeing porn if that&;s
0.03 automatically abuse I mean if a child is
0.03 an abuse victim for seeing porn then
0.03 what about a child who walks into the
0.03 bedroom while his parents are having sex
0.03 this now maybe you hear that that
0.03 response and you think well that&;s
0.03 really stupid and it is but a lot of
0.03 people that was their immediate response
0.03 so I feel like I have to address it and
0.03 this is what porn defenders always seem
0.03 to do this seems to be the only trick in
0.03 their bag is to draw these equivalencies
0.03 obviously there&;s a difference for one
0.03 thing with what a what a child briefly
0.03 witnesses when he walks into a bedroom
0.03 at night before presumably his parents
0.03 immediately usher him out what he
0.03 witnesses will will not really be the
0.03 same as what he will witness if he sits
0.03 on pornhub
0.03 for a few minutes okay also there&;s the
0.03 matter of intent a private act that is
0.03 meant to be private and then is
0.03 accidentally witnessed by someone is
0.03 very different from an act that is
0.03 broadcast on the Internet to a potential
0.03 audience of millions obviously those are
0.03 two different things
0.03 and there&;s a difference in kind also if
0.03 a child walks in on his parents that&;s
0.03 awkward that&;s embarrassing that&;s not
0.03 what you want but what he has witnessed
0.03 what he has unfortunately witnessed is
0.03 still the healthy and properly ordered
0.03 expression of love and devotion between
0.03 two married people you definitely would
0.03 prefer for him not to witness it if
0.03 you&;re the parents but if he does the
0.03 parents can explain they can have the
0.03 awkward birds in the bees conversation
0.03 and they can explain that when a man
0.03 loves a woman they get together they get
0.03 married etc and so forth what he will
0.03 see in a porn film though is a woman
0.03 being used integrated for the pleasure
0.03 of anonymous by standards by standards
0.03 that that again is very very very
0.03 different another people think people
0.03 have countered with is well what about
0.03 other bad stuff kids might see online
0.03 what about what about vulgar violent
0.03 content hateful content graphic
0.03 graphically violent content and as to
0.03 that well as to that sort of stuff it
0.03 kind of depends on what it is because
0.03 there&;s other yeah there is other kind
0.03 there are other kinds of really
0.03 disturbing SiC content online that
0.03 should be illegal and oftentimes is and
0.03 we&;ll get to that in a second but this
0.03 whole what about thing is so weak
0.03 because it would be kind of like if I
0.03 said it should be illegal for a parent
0.03 to punch a child in the face okay which
0.03 it is obviously but what if it wasn&;t
0.03 and then I were to argue that it should
0.03 be and then you go and you say well wait
0.03 a minute but what about a parent who
0.03 smacks a child in the back of the head
0.03 and then it&;s like yeah well that that&;s
0.03 I mean that&;s probably abuse too but it
0.03 may be it depends a little bit on
0.03 context is this a dad with his teenage
0.03 son he&;s kind of horsing around and you
0.03 know it doesn&;t just kind of joking
0.03 around a little is it that or is this is
0.03 this a toddler being smack in the back
0.03 of the head and anger
0.03 by a parent those are two very different
0.03 things so it might depend and then and
0.03 then you go well okay but what about
0.03 what about someone who&;s a child who&;s
0.03 spanked very hard with a belt and again
0.03 it&;s just what you&;re doing is you keep
0.03 coming with these what about sand
0.03 what-ifs and hypotheticals and you&;re
0.03 dragging the conversation further and
0.03 further and further into the gray area
0.03 but remember where we started we started
0.03 with something that is obviously bad and
0.03 should obviously be illegal now if you
0.03 keep going further and further down into
0.03 the gray areas into the fine
0.03 distinctions and all this stuff it&;s
0.03 gonna be harder and harder to draw those
0.03 lines yes but we started with something
0.03 that is very obvious I mean with that we
0.03 all in fact would agree is bad and
0.03 terrible and should be illegal apparent
0.03 punching a child in the face and but
0.03 what you&;ve done is you&;ve seemingly
0.03 intentionally prevented us from
0.03 addressing that issue by trying to make
0.03 it seem like physical abuse itself is so
0.03 ambiguous and so hard to legislate that
0.03 there&;s just no point in punishing or
0.03 prohibiting prohibiting it in any form
0.03 whatsoever you&;ve tried to water down
0.03 the discussion order in order to stop us
0.03 from from talking about a very obvious
0.03 and clear-cut form of abuse okay so any
0.03 any of the what about you can draw here
0.03 that does nothing to address what porn
0.03 is and it is something that is damaging
0.03 and traumatic and harmful to kids
0.03 there&;s no getting around that is there
0.03 other stuff in that category
0.03 maybe but can we talk about this
0.03 category first and if there is other
0.03 stuff that should also be addressed does
0.03 that does that mean we can&;t address
0.03 this why are you so afraid to have this
0.03 conversation
0.03 and speaking of the other kinds of
0.03 content that are illegal in fact someone
0.03 brought this up yesterday I don&;t
0.03 remember if it was on Twitter or or I
0.03 don&;t remember where it maybe was in a
0.03 comment section email huko it&;s all it&;s
0.03 all blurred together but somebody said
0.03 well what about you know there&;s so many
0.03 other horrible things
0.03 what about crushing videos animal
0.03 crushing videos now I don&;t know if
0.03 you&;re familiar with animal crushing
0.03 videos if you aren&;t I&;m sorry I have to
0.03 tell you about them
0.03 but they are a form of video and there&;s
0.03 a lot of them apparently online there&;s
0.03 though there&;s a whole deranged sick
0.03 community of people who post this stuff
0.03 and it it&;s exactly what it sounds like
0.03 it&;s videos of animals being crushed or
0.03 otherwise tortured and killed and these
0.03 videos are post online people watch them
0.03 and because they get some kind of sick
0.03 enjoyment out of it so someone brought
0.03 that up to me said what about the
0.03 crushing and to that I say yeah okay now
0.03 here we go
0.03 yes I would say that is definitely as
0.03 harmful to watch if not more so I mean
0.03 now it kind of depends away but but that
0.03 is definitely at least in the same
0.03 category but here&;s the thing those
0.03 videos are illegal in fact it just so
0.03 happens that they were very recently
0.03 made illegal on the federal level Donald
0.03 Trump just signed something into law
0.03 making it illegal to distribute and
0.03 there were other things involved in this
0.03 law too it wasn&;t just targeted and
0.03 animal crushing videos but that was
0.03 included it is now illegal on the
0.03 federal level as I understand the law to
0.03 distribute post distribute whatever
0.03 these animal crushing videos it&;s
0.03 illegal now that&;s very interesting
0.03 isn&;t it because now it you could easily
0.03 say well that&;s totally different
0.03 because you&;re torturing and killing an
0.03 animal and so something is being killed
0.03 that&;s different from pornography which
0.03 again it&;s it&;s not always different
0.03 from pornography because very often in
0.03 many cases you have trafficked women and
0.03 children who are in these videos and
0.03 and you may not know it as the viewer so
0.03 there is torture and torment going on in
0.03 these videos as well but leaving that
0.03 aside the point is it&;s not it&;s not it
0.03 wasn&;t made illegal to record the videos
0.03 that was already illegal obviously
0.03 obviously it&;s illegal to torture an
0.03 animal so I was already illegal the
0.03 question is once that&;s happened and
0.03 there&;s footage of it and the footage is
0.03 out there I mean unfortunately the
0.03 animals already dead so sharing the
0.03 video is not gonna hurt the animal the
0.03 animals already been killed technically
0.03 that video itself doesn&;t hurt anybody
0.03 its footage of something being hurt but
0.03 the video doesn&;t hurt anybody what the
0.03 law says now is that you even if you
0.03 weren&;t the one who did that you still
0.03 cannot distribute this video so if
0.03 someone were to send me a whole load of
0.03 files of animal crushing videos I didn&;t
0.03 I didn&;t hurt the animals the person who
0.03 sent the videos didn&;t hurt the animals
0.03 the person that he got the videos from
0.03 didn&;t hurt the animals I mean down the
0.03 line we could work 20 50 100 steps
0.03 removed a million steps removed who
0.03 knows but I have these videos now I
0.03 cannot post them online and I shouldn&;t
0.03 be able to in my opinion but I wonder if
0.03 you&;re you know a defender of the
0.03 legality of porn how do you deal with
0.03 that because if you&;re saying that
0.03 pornography is and please I would ask
0.03 you to deal with it
0.03 aside from just scoffing look that&;s
0.03 totally different so stupid well it&;s
0.03 not totally different there there are
0.03 some similarities here that I think you
0.03 have to deal with one is the issue of
0.03 speech I mean if pornography is speech
0.03 then why isn&;t this speech again not the
0.03 act but what about why is it not speech
0.03 for me to distribute these videos maybe
0.03 there&;s a message I&;m trying to send
0.03 that&;ll be a message you like but I mean
0.03 aren&;t a my not expressing myself in
0.03 some way with this video I mean if
0.03 that&;s if that&;s not free speech if that
0.03 doesn&;t count as speech if you&;re not
0.03 gonna buy that that is expression then
0.03 why would a you know a porn video a rape
0.03 porn video even if everyone&;s acting and
0.03 it&;s not really rape but but why is that
0.03 expression
0.03 so I think it touches on the on the
0.03 speech issue it also touches on the
0.03 issue of of the effect of viewing
0.03 content what exactly is the problem with
0.03 having videos of animal crutch crushing
0.03 an animal torture all over the Internet
0.03 what&;s the problem what&;s problem with
0.03 having kids view it I mean again the the
0.03 the being that was unfortunately hurt is
0.03 already dead is not cannot continue to
0.03 be hurt by it so that&;s already done and
0.03 over with so what&;s the harm I mean do
0.03 you think that a child is gonna watch a
0.03 video like that and immediately go out
0.03 and kill his dog maybe but probably not
0.03 that directly but no we&;re okay with
0.03 those videos being illegal I assume
0.03 you&;re probably okay with it I certainly
0.03 am we&;re okay with it because number one
0.03 it&;s just depraved and horrible and ugly
0.03 and wrong and just intrinsically evil
0.03 number two the the the traumatic effect
0.03 it would have on on the viewer
0.03 especially children traumatized by it
0.03 but also the influence it will have on
0.03 them probably you know if a kids exposed
0.03 to that video one time he&;s probably not
0.03 gonna go out and kill his dog but if he
0.03 if he watches that stuff enough and
0.03 starts to find it appealing for some
0.03 reason yeah I think he is gonna be
0.03 influenced obviously got clearly he&;s
0.03 gonna be influenced even if he never
0.03 actually hurts an animal he&;s going to
0.03 be influenced in that direction what
0.03 about all these videos online and some
0.03 of the most popular search terms for
0.03 pornography part of things like rape
0.03 incest teenager and yeah these videos
0.03 the legal ones anyway are it&;s just
0.03 pretend okay it&;s not really incest
0.03 they&;re just they&;re actors maybe that&;s
0.03 not really a fifteen-year-old it&;s just
0.03 it&;s just someone who looks 15 but what
0.03 is the effect okay you watch animal
0.03 crushing videos enough you might be
0.03 inclined to eventually go and and and
0.03 mistreat an animal I think we all
0.03 understand that you watch these kinds of
0.03 videos enough isn&;t that not going to
0.03 sway you is that not going to influence
0.03 you towards maybe being inclined to act
0.03 out these things that you already
0.03 obviously
0.03 appealing and you have been feeding that
0.03 dark part of your soul and your mind
0.03 okay so switching gears here for a
0.03 minute
0.03 it&;s switching gears a little bit
0.03 actually because I think this sort of
0.03 relates to the some of what we&;ve been
0.03 talking about this week but there&;s this
0.03 video that&;s been going around online
0.03 maybe you&;ve seen it it&;s from campus
0.03 reform another other classic you know
0.03 interviewing clueless students on the
0.03 street bit those are always fun but this
0.03 one there the students are asked if they
0.03 support Medicare for all and then they
0.03 all say yes of course and then there and
0.03 then and then we find out if they still
0.03 support it once they discover what&;s
0.03 actually in that bill what it actually
0.03 entails so let&;s uh let&;s watch a little
0.03 bit of this the policy right now they&;re
0.03 proposing it&;s Medicare for all which is
0.03 you know the idea of government-funded
0.03 health care for everyone is that a
0.03 concept you view favorably or
0.03 unfavorably favorably for sure
0.03 I do support Medicare for all I do I do
0.03 think that every American deserves
0.03 health care
0.03 I do support that I think it&;s an
0.03 important form of universal health care
0.03 I do support free health care for
0.03 everybody in general I would say yes I
0.03 do favor Medicare I don&;t think there&;s
0.03 anything that you could really tell me
0.03 that would make me of you unfavorably
0.03 gonna give you a few of those things I
0.03 want to see if you view them favorably
0.03 or unfavorably within the plan and just
0.03 see if it changes your opinion at all so
0.03 first off it is mandatory so it would be
0.03 over 100 million people right now have
0.03 private insurance plans that they like
0.03 they would be removed from those plans
0.03 by the government would be mandatory and
0.03 they would be put on the government plan
0.03 even if they didn&;t want to is that
0.03 something that concerns you at all
0.03 probably yeah do you do that element
0.03 favorably or unfavorably I think I would
0.03 say unfavorably for that unfavorably I
0.03 mean they shouldn&;t be like kicked off
0.03 of it I guess
0.03 that doesn&;t seem fair I would say the
0.03 government can&;t force them to have
0.03 health care with them and they&;re just
0.03 like that&;s what this would do yeah I
0.03 definitely think everyone should have
0.03 health care but I think those who are
0.03 able to get private health care don&;t
0.03 necessarily like shouldn&;t have to
0.03 necessarily be removed from it I mean as
0.03 a Bernie support I think you do have to
0.03 give up some choice just for the benefit
0.03 of everyone in society so the second
0.03 part it would eliminate private health
0.03 insurance the entire industry it would
0.03 be just under a million jobs would be
0.03 eliminated because all insurance moved
0.03 to the government okay very inspiring
0.03 gives you a lot of hope for the future
0.03 of our country doesn&;t it so so how do
0.03 how does this relate to our discussion
0.03 this week well I think it relates this
0.03 way because what you find is that these
0.03 students initially support Medicare for
0.03 all because they find the moral argument
0.03 for it appealing and that&;s and that&;s
0.03 how it&;s sold to them you know and
0.03 that&;s how the left sells all of its
0.03 policy ideas morally so you heard the
0.03 first student say something like people
0.03 deserve it or some of them something
0.03 along those lines which is a moral
0.03 statement talking about what people
0.03 deserve then it all starts to fall apart
0.03 not when they&;re told about the
0.03 financial cost although that does come
0.03 later in the video when they discover
0.03 that the Free Medicare isn&;t actually
0.03 free because the taxpayers have to pay
0.03 for it turns out nothing is free in life
0.03 I guess their dad&;s never told them that
0.03 they never gave them the old money
0.03 doesn&;t grow on trees stick but I think
0.03 you see their dreams for Medicare for
0.03 all start to die in their eyes start to
0.03 fade a little bit when they&;re presented
0.03 with a fuller view of its moral
0.03 implications people will be forced off
0.03 of their private plans people will lose
0.03 their jobs now there are economic issues
0.03 there as well but mainly I think for
0.03 these liberal students it&;s the moral
0.03 problem and so this is just a small
0.03 example but it&;s very important and I&;ve
0.03 been saying that&;s not just this week
0.03 but for years that the the left makes
0.03 moral arguments for all of their
0.03 positions all of it our policy ideas all
0.03 the laws and legislation they support
0.03 everything they always make those
0.03 arguments
0.03 on a moral basis just pay attention next
0.03 time you hear a leftist whoever it is a
0.03 Ossie Bernie Sanders what Elizabeth
0.03 Warren I mean listen to the to the
0.03 Democratic debates every argument they
0.03 make is is moral in its character
0.03 now when I say moral I don&;t mean
0.03 morally good I don&;t agree with their
0.03 arguments but they&;re of a moral
0.03 character they&;re making the argument
0.03 based on morality based on what they
0.03 believe what they are claiming is just
0.03 the right thing to do and that&;s how
0.03 they argue for everything it&;s not about
0.03 how much it&;s gonna cost not about it
0.03 it&;s not really about economy it&;s those
0.03 are a peripheral those are secondary
0.03 issues for them the way they present it
0.03 is listen this is just the right thing
0.03 to do and it&;s effective it&;s persuasive
0.03 maybe not to you maybe not to me but to
0.03 a lot of people it is especially people
0.03 in my generation and younger they find
0.03 it very persuasive because these are the
0.03 arguments they care about these are the
0.03 arguments everybody cares about when it
0.03 comes down to it nobody really cares
0.03 about any argument that isn&;t moral I
0.03 mean yeah you could talk about you could
0.03 start getting into the financials and
0.03 pull out the calculator and show how
0.03 this is gonna be more nobody I mean this
0.03 whole idea that people vote based on
0.03 their pocket book I don&;t know who came
0.03 up with that originally but it is such
0.03 nonsense people do not vote up vote on
0.03 their pocketbook or their wallet they
0.03 vote on morality that&;s how people vote
0.03 what drives you to the polls it&;s
0.03 because you you you think you&;re
0.03 standing for what&;s right or because
0.03 you&;re afraid of someone else who&;s
0.03 gonna do the wrong thing take America
0.03 down the wrong path the morally wrong
0.03 path to a dark and evil future right
0.03 that&;s what gets you there it&;s not
0.03 about that it&;s not it&;s not about the
0.03 money so what&;s happened is the left
0.03 they have hectored the right four years
0.03 saying you can&;t legislate morality you
0.03 can&;t legislate morality stop trying to
0.03 legislate morality and then but they
0.03 turn around and they make moral
0.03 arguments for everything so they say
0.03 don&;t legislate morality and then they
0.03 turn around and unabashedly try to
0.03 slate morality but the rights you know
0.03 you see we on the right wheat and and
0.03 I&;m sorry this is the case but we tend
0.03 to be pretty gullible and clueless and
0.03 it takes us a long time apparently to
0.03 pick up on things and so we got suckered
0.03 into this where the left forces don&;t
0.03 legislate morality and eventually
0.03 conservatives said oh you&;re right yeah
0.03 no no we don&;t to do that now we won&;t
0.03 argue about morals anymore
0.03 no yeah let&;s not argue about that then
0.03 we went off over here and started
0.03 arguing about financials and everything
0.03 else while the left they cleared the
0.03 field they&;re sitting there saying you
0.03 stupid suckers I can&;t believe you fell
0.03 for that and now they just continue now
0.03 they make every argument on a moral
0.03 basis and they can say that look you see
0.03 those people over there they&;re not even
0.03 arguing for what&;s right they don&;t care
0.03 they just care about their money those
0.03 greedy Scrooge&;s you see what they did
0.03 they convinced us to vacate the moral
0.03 premises and make arguments on economy
0.03 or whatever else and while they
0.03 continued to make those arguments so
0.03 that we look like unfeeling sociopaths
0.03 and automatons and nobody is persuaded
0.03 nobody finds it compelling
0.03 no one cares we&;re not convincing
0.03 anybody I mean worse is when you run
0.03 into conservatives who are so I&;m sorry
0.03 stupid that they think especially you
0.03 can&;t make moral arguments to young
0.03 people that&;s what they think they think
0.03 you think well you got to especially
0.03 stay away from that with young kid no
0.03 with young people you especially have to
0.03 make the moral arguments they&;re the
0.03 most persuaded by those when you&;re
0.03 young you&;re the most likely to be
0.03 idealistic you care about you know
0.03 fighting for what&;s right and you&;re
0.03 willing to make sacrifices but you just
0.03 you care more about that when you&;re
0.03 younger when you get older I think you
0.03 become a little bit more practical and
0.03 you start making compromises some of
0.03 them good and some of them bad you stop
0.03 caring as much about some of the you
0.03 start being you stop being as convicted
0.03 as you once were on moral issues I think
0.03 now that&;s not I don&;t think that&;s good
0.03 I don&;t think it should be that way but
0.03 that is how it kind of works but again
0.03 the left they they they suckered us they
0.03 fooled us they said oh no young people
0.03 don&;t care
0.03 that yeah talk to young people about tax
0.03 policy they&;re really gonna be they&;re
0.03 really gonna be convinced by that then
0.03 they start go laughing at us did you
0.03 hear them I just told him I just told
0.03 him to talk to young people about tax
0.03 policy and they believed it that&;s it
0.03 yes that&;s what&;s happening I mean we
0.03 need to we need to wake up and realize
0.03 [Music]
0.03 every all laws entail legislating
0.03 morality every law does but the left
0.03 knows that the only people who don&;t
0.03 know it anymore are conservatives when
0.03 it used to be that conservatives were
0.03 the ones pointing us out
0.03 it really is brilliant I mean you almost
0.03 have to respect it it&;s it&;s so
0.03 brilliant when you realize what the left
0.03 has done it is really genius the way
0.03 that over a few decades they have
0.03 convinced conservatives to completely
0.03 abandon their own principles and their
0.03 own position Wow incredible also very
0.03 depressing here&;s something that&;s not
0.03 depressing this holiday season do your
0.03 friends and family a solid by getting
0.03 them a daily wire gift membership and
0.03 the good news for you
0.03 from now till January 1st all insider
0.03 plus gift memberships will be twenty
0.03 five percent off that means your loved
0.03 one will get all the fantastic perks
0.03 plus the majestic glorious beautiful
0.03 profound leftist tears tumblr and you&;ll
0.03 get the savings that&;s 25 percent off
0.03 all the insider plus gift memberships
0.03 this holiday season go to daily wire.com
0.03 slash gift to get your twenty five
0.03 percent off again that&;s daily wire.com
0.03 slash gift get your twenty five percent
0.03 off just don&;t tell your loved ones that
0.03 you save twenty five percent on their
0.03 gift in fact tell them that it was
0.03 twenty five percent more that we charged
0.03 just on principle but you&;ll be giving
0.03 them a gift that they&;ll thank you for
0.03 all year long let&;s go to emails matt
0.03 wall show at gmail.com this is from
0.03 samantha says hi Matt big fan of the
0.03 show yesterday you talked about the new
0.03 baby it&;s cold outside I agree that that
0.03 song is horrid but also hilarious but it
0.03 doesn&;t hold a candle to Santa baby
0.03 which is the worst Christmas song ever
0.03 hands down Samantha I&;m afraid you are
0.03 incorrect the worst Christmas song ever
0.03 hands down his wonderful Christmas time
0.03 by Paul McCartney there is nothing that
0.03 comes close to it this song is so bad
0.03 that every
0.03 think McCartney has done in his career
0.03 or ever accomplished is erased by it
0.03 none of that matters because he will
0.03 forever and always be the guy who made
0.03 the terrible redundant pointless empty
0.03 awful song that plays over the intercom
0.03 at the department store or every 12
0.03 minutes on the Christmas radio station
0.03 you know your local Christmas music
0.03 radio station I&;ll tell you what makes a
0.03 song so bad it&;s stupid and lazy
0.03 so other bad Christmas songs are just
0.03 stupid Santa baby is stupid
0.03 last Christmas is stupid but at least
0.03 they&;ve got their own kind of vibe to
0.03 them their own sort of they they aren&;t
0.03 good but it sounds like maybe the people
0.03 involved put a little bit of effort into
0.03 it maybe wonderful Christmas time you
0.03 could tell the McCartney wrote it in 95
0.03 seconds scrawled it on a used paper
0.03 plate took another three minutes to come
0.03 up with a melody and that was it so just
0.03 I mean let&;s listen listen to the lyrics
0.03 I&;m not gonna sing them but let&;s just
0.03 go think it helps sometimes to read them
0.03 like spoken word poetry the moon is
0.03 right the spirits up we&;re here tonight
0.03 and that&;s enough simply having a
0.03 wonderful christmas time simply having a
0.03 wonderful christmas time okay
0.03 what does that mean the moon is right
0.03 and who evolved the moon for Christmas
0.03 the imagery here is it&;s not even
0.03 relevant we&;re here tonight and that&;s
0.03 enough has never been a more obvious
0.03 throwaway line well there has been in
0.03 this song because every line is a
0.03 throwaway
0.03 he&;s just filling space he&;s biding his
0.03 time till he gets to the end of the song
0.03 the party&;s on the feelings here that
0.03 only comes this time of year simply
0.03 having a wonderful christmas time simply
0.03 having a wonderful christmas time aside
0.03 from wonderful christmas time has he
0.03 even said anything that has anything to
0.03 do with christmas and what is the
0.03 feelings here mean the feeling just
0.03 arrived to the party hey guys the
0.03 feelings finally here what took you so
0.03 long the choir of children&;s sing their
0.03 song they practice all year long ding
0.03 dong ding dong ding dong ding dong
0.03 simply having a wonderful christmas time
0.03 simply having a wonderful christmas time
0.03 i mean come on you you can tell exactly
0.03 what happened here he had one line in
0.03 mind for this verse that&;s all he could
0.03 come up with he could only think of one
0.03 line the choir chil
0.03 and sing their song could think of
0.03 anything else thought about it though
0.03 for 10 seconds and in fact it&;s not even
0.03 it&;s not obvious to me that Paul
0.03 McCartney even knows what Christmas is
0.03 do they have Christmas in England is
0.03 that the problem here I don&;t think he
0.03 knows what it is that&;s what I&;m getting
0.03 from the lyrics he has no idea what this
0.03 thing is someone called him up and says
0.03 can he make a Christmas song and he said
0.03 at Christmas what I got Chris a
0.03 Christmas Chris Christmas and then he
0.03 said I don&;t know what that is but do
0.03 people have a wonderful time on it yeah
0.03 yeah they do okay I got it I got you
0.03 I&;ll call you back in five minutes so he
0.03 puts down choir you know choir sings the
0.03 song then he&;s like yeah choir sings a
0.03 song Carson so they practice all year
0.03 long and now we need another you know
0.03 needs another two he needs another two
0.03 lines to fill out the verse and sorry so
0.03 he thinks it&;s practice all your law
0.03 that&;s in the song dingdong dingdong
0.03 dingdong dingdong the word is out about
0.03 the town to lift a glass and don&;t look
0.03 down don&;t what well now he&;s given up
0.03 okay this at the end he&;s given up it&;s
0.03 actually very depressing morbid song
0.03 because at the end he&;s given up on
0.03 music he&;s given off giving up on
0.03 himself he&;s given up on life it was
0.03 this verse the word is out around the
0.03 town what word the word that Christmas
0.03 that&;s Christmastime
0.03 I think people are calling it hey guys
0.03 you know crisp it&;s Christmastime did
0.03 you guys know that lift the glass and
0.03 don&;t look down well what do you mean
0.03 don&;t look down at the glass he needs
0.03 but he needs a he needs a word that
0.03 rhymes with town and so he says well
0.03 town down Brown now down down yeah don&;t
0.03 look down don&;t look down that&;s it yeah
0.03 we&;ll go with that simply having a
0.03 wonderful christmas time simply having a
0.03 wonderful christmas time simply having a
0.03 wonderful christmas time simply having a
0.03 wonderful christmas time again take the
0.03 chorus out and you have no clue this is
0.03 a christmas song there is no Christmas
0.03 imagery at all in this song honey I&;m
0.03 not even asking for religious content
0.03 that&;s not my point okay I know he&;s not
0.03 going to start talking about the
0.03 christ-child but I mean no sleigh bells
0.03 no eggnog no tree no mistletoe no Holly
0.03 no nothing this is you know what this is
0.03 like this is like if you&;re gonna make a
0.03 crappy pointless repetitive stupid
0.03 country song but you never say anything
0.03 in the song about blue jeans or pickup
0.03 trucks or corn fields like if you&;re
0.03 gonna give us that kind of song then
0.03 give us that song don&;t give us a bad
0.03 country song that doesn&;t even have the
0.03 stuff in it that makes it a country song
0.03 so now we&;d have to get we have a bad
0.03 country song that isn&;t even cut it&;s
0.03 just a bad song it&;s just a blad generic
0.03 song that isn&;t even country so don&;t
0.03 give us a bad Christmas song that lacks
0.03 even the Christmas parts of it because
0.03 now we have a bad song that I don&;t even
0.03 know what to do with well apparently we
0.03 play it all the time on Christmas I have
0.03 no idea why so all the other bad
0.03 Christmas songs you can name they&;re bad
0.03 they&;re stupid they&;re annoying but they
0.03 are Christmas Santa baby I don&;t know
0.03 what&;s going on in that song I get what
0.03 this is like a love song to Santa pretty
0.03 weird okay Santa is a what eighteen
0.03 hundred year old fat morbidly obese man
0.03 who breaks into he&;s a serial burglar
0.03 breaking into people&;s homes and she&;s
0.03 so that&;s strange but at least Santa so
0.03 you got Santa at least at least there&;s
0.03 at least we&;ve got Santa so there&;s some
0.03 Christmasy stuff going on all right I
0.03 actually had more emails I was gonna do
0.03 but that I spent 15 minutes on why I
0.03 hate wonderful Christmas time so I think
0.03 we&;ll just have to wrap it up there and
0.03 hope you guys all have a great weekend
0.03 Godspeed
0.03 the Matt Walsh show is produced by Sean
0.03 Hampton executive producer Jeremy boring
0.03 senior producer Jonathan hey supervising
0.03 producer Mathis Glover supervising
0.03 producer Robert Stirling technical
0.03 producer Austin Stephens editor Donovan
0.03 Fowler audio mixer Mike Cora Mina the
0.03 Matt Walsh show is a daily wire
0.03 production copyright daily wire 20 19
0.03 if you prefer facts over feelings aren&;t
0.03 offended by the brutal truth and you can
0.03 still laugh at the insanity filling our
0.03 national news cycle well tune in to the
0.03 Ben Shapiro show we will get a whole lot
0.03 of that and much more see you there
.
Cet article, qui traite du thème “information chasteté”, vous est spécialement suggéré par blog.chaste-t.com. La chronique est reproduite du mieux possible. Dans le cas où vous souhaitez apporter quelques précisions concernant le domaine de “information chasteté” vous pouvez solliciter notre rédaction. La destination de blog.chaste-t.com est de débattre de information chasteté dans la transparence en vous apportant la connaissance de tout ce qui est en lien avec ce sujet sur la toile Connectez-vous sur notre site blog.chaste-t.com et nos réseaux sociaux dans le but d’être informé des futures publications.